How to Avoid Earlobe Deformation in Face Lift

Date 4 December 2018

How to Avoid Earlobe Deformation in Face Lift

Marlen Sulamanidze • Constantin Sulamanidze • Georgii Sulamanidze


Abstract

 

Background During the postoperative period following a facelift, caudal extension of the earlobe secondary to pulling of the submandibular tissues can occur. This ear-lobe shape, often termed ‘‘pixie ear’’, is unnatural, and patients often request its repair. The objective of this study was to design a modified facelift technique that provides natural, aesthetically acceptable, and long-lasting results.

 

Methods In patients with pixie ear secondary to classical rhytidectomy, we omitted the incision around the earlobe; instead, we interrupted it in front of the earlobe and fin-ished it behind the earlobe, without fully dissecting the earlobe from its base. We then performed all required stages of the facelift: detachment of the cellulocutaneous flap, manipulation of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system, establishment of homeostasis, lifting of the cuta-neous flap, and finally suturing of the retained edges of the skin onto the cartilage matrix of the pinna.

 


Results The above-described operative technique was used in 24 patients from October 2008 to January 2014. Long-lasting projected results were achieved in each case. Conclusions The modified facelift technique described herein can be used to perform facelifts with a pre-existing pixie ear, as well as to prevent the development of pixie ear.

 

Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full de-scription of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

 

 

Introduction

 

In facelift procedures, the earlobe is dissected and separated from its base. It is then sutured at the end of the procedure so that its postoperative shape is natural and well rounded, without downward stretching due to pulling of the submandibular and cervical tissues. However, this tech-nique does not always lead to the desired result. In some cases, the earlobe together with the cicatrices begins to slide downward. This process of earlobe elongation con-tinues as long as the pull of the underlying tissues remains strong (Fig. 1).


 

Such extended or augmented earlobes, often termed pixie ears, are unnatural in appearance, and an undesired outcome of the facelift procedure. Women often conceal this defect with their hair or earrings; men have fewer options for concealment. Many patients thus request repair of the pixie ear. However, the classical operative tech-niques lead to additional visible cicatrices.

 

We designed a modified facelift operation that has made it possible to avoid pixie ear-like deformations and obtain natural, aesthetically acceptable, and long-lasting results. We herein describe this technique and its outcomes.


Materials and Methods

 

Operative Technique

 

The preoperative markings are shown in Fig. 2 and Video

 

1. A top-to-bottom incision was made in front of the base of the helix, extending around the tragus from the back, and proceeding from the intertragic notch in front of the ear-lobe, stopping at the lowest attachment point of the earlobe. The incision was then restarted at the lowest attachment point of the earlobe but from the back and proceeding upward along the projection of the retroauricular fold. Thus, the incision did not proceed around the earlobe, but was rather interrupted in front of the earlobe and finished behind it (Fig. 2a).

 

Next, mobilization of the earlobe was performed all the way to the cartilage matrix of the pinna. Detachment of the facial cellulocutaneous flap and submandibular and cervi-cal areas as well as all other required manipulations of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) was com-pleted (Fig. 2b). After establishment of homeostasis, the retained skin edge of the earlobe was lifted up together with the earlobe (Fig. 2c) and sutured to the solid cartilage matrix of the pinna with one or two interrupted sutures using 3/0 Vicryl and two cutaneous sutures using 5/0 Prolene in the front and back of the base of the earlobe. The frontal interrupted suture was situated in the intertragic notch (Fig. 2d). The wound that appeared after the folding of the earlobe was sutured using two to three interrupted stitches on the front and back surfaces of the earlobe (Fig. 2e). It was sometimes necessary to excise small tri-angular areas of the skin to adequately appose the wound edges (Fig. 3a). The pixie ear shape was thus transformed into a well-rounded earlobe (Video 1). The entire cellulo-cutaneous flap was then lifted upward and sideways. The excess skin was excised and the wounds were sutured. As shown in Fig. 4, the above-described operation technique can be outlined in the following manner: point A moves to point A1, and point B moves to point B1.

 

The indications for our modified facelift technique are as follows: congenital, traumatic, or iatrogenic augmented (extended) earlobes; large earlobes with a broad base re-quiring a reduction in height and width; and a coarse, de-forming cicatrix below, behind, and on the surface of the earlobe caused by a failed facelift.

 

From October 2008 to January 2014, we performed 24 facelifts with the above-described modifications; 7 were primary operations and 17 were reoperations. All patients were female with an average age of 52 years. The patients’ surgical characteristics according to age are presented in Table 1.


Fig. 2 Preoperative markings. a Intraoperative photo. Incision. c b Intraoperative photo. Mobilization of earlobe, of whole skin cellulocutaneous flap. c Intraoperative photo. Earlobe and skin edge are lifted up. d Intraoperative photo. Moment of earlobe skin edge fixation to solid cartilage matrix. e Intraoperative photo. Moment of earlobe wound suturing from backside.




 Results

 

We monitored the operative outcomes for 2.0–3.5 years in 5 patients, for 1.0–2.0 years in 8 patients, and for\1.0 year in 11 patients. In all cases, we obtained stable postoperative results: the earlobe remained well rounded, its base did not slide downward, and the cicatrices in the parotid area re-mained hidden. There were no indications of any compli-cations related to this modified facelift. All wounds healed by primary intention, and the patients’ social rehabilitation period did not exceed the normally expected limits (Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9).

 







 

Discussion

 

A number of anatomical and morphological studies of the ear and parotid areas have been performed. These reports have discussed the possibilities of surgical repair of the pinna in general and, in particular, for surgical antiaging procedures and cervicoplasty to alter its shape and standing [1, 2]. More recent specialized scientific literature on facelifts has dealt extensively with the negative postop-erative aspects of such surgical procedures, namely the unnatural appearance of the operative outcome [310]. The most obvious characteristics of an artificial-appearing re-sult include unnatural lifting of the lower part of the face, visible cicatrices in the front part of the face as well as below and behind the earlobe, and elongation and down-ward shifting of the earlobe. The principal cause of such deformations after rhytidectomy is excessive pulling on the base of the earlobe during the postoperative period, which may be particularly problematic if the mobilized flap of the submandibular or cervical areas (cutaneous and/or SMAS) is overstrained or sutured to the earlobe. Regardless of whether a facelift is performed using the classical tech-niques or short incisions (e.g. S-lift, minimal-access cranial suspension) or by tensioning or covering the SMAS, ear-lobe deformation is still possible because the tension of the SMAS and/or the skin below the earlobe might distort the lobe, resulting in the development of pixie ear. Correction of such a deformation is considered to be a difficult task, and suggested methods have included the V–Y flap, ‘‘Pac Man’’ flap, and thread facelift. Stuzin [1] suggested dis-secting the lowest triangular earlobe edge and suturing it to the base of the pinna, thus achieving a well-rounded shape. Man [3] recommended suturing the mobilized cellulocu-taneous flap of the submandibular and cervical areas and the SMAS flap to the mastoidal periosteum, rather than suspending it to the base of the pinna. The method pro-posed by Frishberg [8] involves creating a triangular deepidermisized area on the cutaneous flap already sutured in the area of the base of the ear and then suturing the base of the earlobe to it.

 

These suggested techniques are based on the clinical experiences of the authors and the results of anatomic and morphological studies. No such studies have involved pa-tients who have undergone rhytidectomy. Such studies may provide a better understanding of the causes of pinna de-formities, thus helping to develop more effective preven-tive measures.

 

Through many years of clinical practice, we have at-tempted almost all recommendations to prevent facelift-associated earlobe deformities and treat them through ad-ditional post-facelift surgeries. These measures, however, have not always been successful, which is why we have designed a technique involving the establishment of cuta-neous support at the base of the earlobe that prevents its shape from changing after a facelift.

 

The main difference between our method and others is that in our method, the incision is not made around the pinna; that is, we do not edge the earlobe, but rather in-terrupt the incision in front of the earlobe and finish it behind the earlobe. Thus, the edge of the earlobe skin is left untouched at its base. At the end of the operation, this area of skin (about 0.8–1.5 cm wide) is lifted upward, and the base of the earlobe is grasped and sutured to the solid base of the pinna. This cutaneous flap supports the base of the earlobe, serving as a counterweight to the tension of the lifted tissues and preventing the earlobe from sliding down. In cases of reoperation, this location may have pronounced cicatrices from the previous operation. We do not excise these cicatrices, but move them upward with the earlobe and suture them to the base of the ear. The cicatrices, sometimes quite large and coarse, can thus easily be con-cealed in the crease under and behind the earlobe and are not visible after the operation. They contribute to sup-porting the earlobe base, and the skin does not slide down during the postoperative period (Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9).

 

Several characteristic aspects of the herein-described facelift modification should be discussed:


1.     The length of the lifted cutaneous flap is limited by the length of the stretched earlobe. That is why the main indication for this operation is considered to be a stretched earlobe of C2 cm. It might seem that a facelift within the 2 cm range is not sufficient to obtain a satisfactory outcome; however, our experience has shown otherwise. Repeated rhytidectomies do not, as a rule, require removal of large amounts of skin.Additionally, if the operation includes mobilization and SMAS lifting, tightening of the skin in the lower zone of the face and the neck bottom to top on 2 cm; that is, removing this volume of skin is more than adequate to achieve a good facelift result.


2.    Toward the end of the operation, the lower skin edge of the earlobe is sutured to the base of the pinna, whereas the earlobe itself is folded in half; therefore, the obtained punctured wound must be sutured on both the front and back. The resulting cicatrix on the front surface of the earlobe is usuallysituated in the projection of the intertragic notch and is perfectly inconspicuous in the postoperative peri-od. The cicatrix on the back surface of the earlobe is not visible.

 

3.  One might assume that incomplete release of the detached cutaneous flap from the lobule of the pinna creates difficult working conditions deep within the wound, such as limitations in visibility, tissue mobi-lization, homeostasis, and application of stitches. In our experience, however, it is quite easy to adjust to this technique with no difficulties.



Conclusions

 

We have described a new facelift technique that prevents the development of or repairs an already existing pixie ear deformation. This face lift technique requires more expe-rience and empirical data before it becomes widespread; however, we predict that this operation will be very useful in certain circumstances.

 

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

 

 

References

 

1.  Stuzin J, Azaria R, Adler N, Silfen R, Regev D, Hauben DJ (2003) Morphometry of the adult human earlobe: a study of 547 subject and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:2403–2404

 

2. Barton F (2009) Aesthetic Surgery of the Face and Neck. Aesthet Surg 29(6):449–463


3. Man D (2009) Reducing the incidence of ear deformity in facelift. Aesthet Surg 29(4):264–271

 

4. Marten E (2006) The ‘‘Pac-Man’’ earlobe operation. Plast Re-constr Surg 118:559

 

5. Mowlavi A, Meldrum G, Wilhelmi B, Chavami A, Zook E (2003) The aesthetic earlobe: classification of lobule ptosis based on survey of North American Ceucasians. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:266

 

6. Mowlavi A, Meldrum G, Wilhelmi B, Russell R, Zook E (2005) The pixie ear deformity following face lift surgery revisited. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1165

 

7. Hoefflin S, Rubin A, Cleveland C (2001) Simple Repair of a Pixie Earlobe. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1623

 

8. Frishberg IA (2005) Aesthetic surgery of the face. Akademkniga, Moscow, p 271

 

9. Sulamanidze M, Sulamanidze G, Sulamanidze C (2010) How to avoid the incidence of earlobe deformity in face lift. In: 26th International Congress French Society of Aesthetic Surgery, May 2010, Abstract Book, p 5

 

10.  Sulamanidze K, Sulamanidze G, Sulamanidze M (2009) Minimally invasive lifting of the lover face and neck: various methods and combinations thereof. In: The 15th world congress of IPRAS 2009 New Delhi, India. Abstract Book, p 64